Carbon dating is a flawed process
The Mexicologist, Professor George Kubler of Yale, stressed that certain traditions contained in Mesoamerican heritage were referred by me to events of the pre-Christian era.
The radiocarbon dates diverge from the historical dates by several hundred years (often 500 to 700), and, interestingly, in the Egyptian samples more so than in samples from most other ancient civilizations.The correctness of the method depends greatly on the condition that in the last 40 or 50 thousand years the quantity of water in the hydrosphere (and carbon diluted in it) has not substantially changed. The method depends also on the condition that during the same period of time the influx of cosmic rays or energy particles coming from the stars and the sun has not suffered substantial variations.To check on the method before applying it on various historical and paleontological material, Libby chose material of Egyptian archaeology, under the assumption that no other historical material from over 2,000 years ago is so secure as to its absolute dating.In Worlds in Collision I claimed that the time since the last glaciation needs to be drastically shortened: the figure considered valid in 1950, the year Worlds in Collision was published, was still Lyells of 100 years earlier, namely 35 thousand years. previously this maximum advance had been assumed to date from about 25,000 years ago, actually 35,000 if one looks up the literature of the time. found that, as I also claimed, another advance of ice took place only 3,500 years ago.Libby found (and I quote Frederick Johnson, who participated in his volume, Radiocarbon Dating) that the advance of the ice occurred about 1 1,000 years ago . A few years later Rubin and Suess of the Geological Survey of the U. The second confirmation came concerning the age of the petroleum. The surprising fact was that oil was found there in Recent sediment and must have been deposited during the last 9,200 years. (Emphasis added.) Actually I asked Libby whether he would see to it that petroleum should be subjected to tests and it was he who drew my attention to the work done by Smith.Now let us review in the light of research in cosmic catastrophism the correctives that, in our view, need to be introduced into the method.
We must also evaluate the basic reliance on Egyptian chronology that, as we shall see, needs to be discontinued.
But I could not and should not satisfy myself with this support without repaying by demonstrating where the difficulties and pitfalls of the method are hidden.
In the cataclysmic events reconstructed in Worlds in Collision and also those that preceded the fall of the Middle Kingdom in Egypt, various effects could not but vitiate the radiocarbon performance, some of these effects tending to make organic life appear older than its actual age, and others making it appear more recent.
But as the method was refined, it started to show rather regular anomalies.
First, it was noticed that, when radiocarbon dated, wood grown in the 20th century appears more ancient than wood grown in the 19th century.
When objects of the Old Kingdom and Middle Kingdom of Egypt yielded carbon dates that appeared roughly comparable with the historical dates, Libby made his method known.